Butterfly of Dreams Dommasandra — Proposed Project Guide
Butterfly of Dreams Dommasandra. Butterfly of Dreams is a publisher working name—not a confirmed public project name—for a proposed mixed-use site in Dommasandra with 1,188 homes.
| Project detail | Current information |
|---|---|
| Name status | Publisher working name; public project name not confirmed |
| Location | Dommasandra, off Sarjapur Road. The available point is not a confirmed entrance. |
| Gross site | Approximately 22.25 acres |
| Residential programme | 1,188 proposed units; not current inventory or availability |
| Built form | Six proposed residential towers and one commercial block |
Request project details
Artist’s impression
What is currently known about Butterfly of Dreams?
Butterfly of Dreams is the publisher’s working name for a proposed mixed-use development at Dommasandra, off Sarjapur Road. The available planning information describes residential and commercial components across approximately 22.25 acres, with 1,188 proposed residential units. The name has not been confirmed as the project’s publicly announced identity, so every commercial or legal document should be checked against its own project name, company, phase and date before the working name is treated as equivalent.
The proposed built form comprises six residential towers and one commercial block. Residential Towers 1 to 5 are described with three basements, a ground floor and 36 upper floors; Tower 6 is described with three basements, a ground floor and 37 upper floors. The commercial block is described with four basements, a ground floor and 34 upper floors. These are planning-stage figures, not proof that construction has started or that a tower, floor, stack or home is currently offered.
The gross site area is approximately 22.25 acres, while the current document-supported net site area is approximately 21.73 acres. A minor conflicting transcription appears in the publisher’s report, so this guide uses the value supported by the current project documents. Buyers should keep gross and net area distinct: gross area describes the wider parcel, while net planning area is the more useful denominator when testing landscape, coverage and shared-space percentages.
The residential count of 1,188 units describes a proposed programme, not current inventory. It does not identify phase, tower allocation, bedroom mix, carpet area, saleable area, orientation or availability. A shortlist therefore needs a current schedule showing the legal project name, phase, tower, unit reference, configuration, area basis and revision date. Those identifiers should remain consistent across the plan, area statement, cost sheet and payment schedule.
Landscape is one of the clearer planning commitments. The proposal states approximately 8.73 acres of landscape, described as 40% of net site area, together with 800 proposed trees. This is a meaningful scale signal, but it is not a delivered landscape, final planting schedule, guaranteed view or promise that every home faces greenery. A current landscape plan should show how planted areas are distributed, which spaces sit at natural ground, how pedestrian routes connect them, and which portions belong to the relevant phase.
The proposed infrastructure includes a 2,020 KLD sewage treatment plant, a 1,020-cubic-metre rainwater sump and 22 recharge pits. These system-level figures help frame practical questions about water reuse, plant location, phasing, access for maintenance, noise buffers and operating responsibility. They do not establish completed capacity or performance. Ask how the system is divided between residential and commercial components and whether the selected phase depends on shared infrastructure delivered later.
IINSPIRA GOLD COUNTY LLP is the project company identified in the planning information. That neutral role is the only company relationship stated on this site. The company is not relabelled as developer, promoter, builder, seller or authorised channel, and the website does not attribute the project to another organization. Before relying on a sales representation, match the legal project company and promoter roles in the current registration and transaction documents.
The public name, launch position, registration identifier, possession date, construction status, prices, payment plan and availability remain unconfirmed. Those gaps do not erase the useful planning facts, but they determine how the facts should be used. The site scale, residential count, tower schedule, landscape allocation and utility programme can support an early planning comparison. They cannot support a booking decision until the legal identity and current commercial package are available together.
Start the document comparison with identity. Check the legal project name, project company, promoter role, survey details, phase and revision date. Then compare the sanctioned or currently issued master plan with the tower and unit plan. Finally match the area statement, specification, cost sheet, payment schedule and payment-recipient details to the same phase and unit. If any identifier changes between documents, request a reconciled set rather than combining attractive details from different revisions.
Use the working name as a navigation aid, not as a substitute for legal identity. A current project announcement may eventually confirm the name, replace it or attach it to a narrower phase. Until that happens, the most reliable buyer file is one in which every plan, approval and commercial sheet carries the same legal subject. This approach protects the useful early-stage context while avoiding assumptions about launch, affiliation or availability.
Master-plan context
The proposed development brings six residential towers and one commercial block onto a gross site of approximately 22.25 acres. That scale gives buyers a useful checklist for a future plan: legal boundary, phase limits, entries, tower labels, vehicle and pedestrian movement, commercial separation, landscape distribution, utility locations and emergency access. None of those project-specific relationships is claimed by the image shown here.
The generic planning concept is deliberately independent of the current project drawings. It does not reproduce the boundary, tower count, access, orientation, amenities or measurements, and it is not to scale. Use it only to understand the kinds of relationships a current master plan should make legible. The authoritative comparison must use a rights-cleared drawing carrying the same legal project name, phase and revision as the home documents.
Read a current plan from the outside inward. Confirm the survey boundary and title block first, then locate each entry and understand whether residential and commercial traffic share access. Trace fire-tender movement, service access and pedestrian paths. Identify tower labels, setbacks, open spaces, utility compounds and landscape zones. A visually attractive rendering cannot answer these questions unless the drawing legend, dimensions and approval references support it.
The proposed landscape allocation of approximately 8.73 acres and 800-tree programme deserve a distribution check. Ask how much planting is at natural ground, how much sits above basements, where large-canopy trees are feasible and whether the landscape percentage includes buffers or inaccessible edges. Compare the answer with the selected tower’s approach, shared-space access and outlook rather than assuming that a project-wide percentage applies equally to every home.
Utility placement is another plan-reading task. A 2,020 KLD sewage treatment plant, 1,020-cubic-metre rainwater sump and 22 recharge pits are proposed. The current plan should show their locations, access routes and relationship to residential buildings, commercial areas and landscape. Confirm operating responsibility, phasing, treated-water use and any acoustic or odour-control provisions in the current technical schedule.
Finally, bind the master plan to the unit choice. The tower label, phase, orientation and unit reference on the floor plan should exist on the same current master plan. The legal project name and revision should match the area statement and cost sheet. This cross-check turns a master plan from a promotional overview into a practical decision document.
Generic conceptual master-planning study
Artist’s impression
Generalized floor-plan guidance
The 3 BHK and 4 BHK cards are publisher-approved planning references, not confirmed current-project configurations. The generalized ranges are 2,400-3,500 sq ft for the 3 BHK reference and 4,500-6,000 sq ft for the 4 BHK reference. They do not establish carpet area, built-up area, saleable area, room dimensions, orientation, stack, inventory or price.
Use the concepts to prepare household questions. Start with how many private rooms are needed, whether work or study space must be separated, how frequently guests stay, and whether everyday movement between entrance, living, kitchen, utility and bedrooms feels practical. Then test storage, natural light, cross-ventilation, furniture walls, bathroom privacy and service circulation on the current measured plan.
Area totals are not comparable until their basis is the same. A larger saleable figure can include different proportions of walls and shared areas, while carpet area addresses a different measurement. Ask for the definition and component schedule for every stated area. Keep the area statement beside the floor plan and cost sheet so the commercial rate is not accidentally compared across unlike units.
Orientation should come from the current tower and stack plan, not from a generic cutaway. Confirm north, entry direction, balcony aspect, neighbouring towers, service zones and any commercial edge from the issued plan. Visit the site or use a verified current drawing to understand daylight and outlook; the representative gallery cannot establish a project view.
Room labels also need a use test. A bedroom count does not tell a household whether circulation, wardrobe depth, study space, dining width or utility movement will work. Place essential furniture on the measured plan and check door swings, passage widths and usable wall lengths. For a larger home, examine whether family, guest and service movement remain comfortably separated.
Before comparing a future offering, request the configuration schedule, current floor plan, area statement, specification and dated cost sheet as one package. Confirm legal project name, phase, tower, stack, unit reference, revision and area basis on every document. If the planning reference differs from the current project document, the current project document governs the comparison.
Generalized 3 BHK planning concept
3 BHK
Publisher-approved planning reference only; not a confirmed current-project configuration or measurement.
Request current price documents
Generalized 4 BHK planning concept
4 BHK
Publisher-approved planning reference only; not a confirmed current-project configuration or measurement.
Request current price documentsArtist’s impression · generalized dimensions, not project measurements · not to scale
Landscape and utility planning
The proposed landscape programme covers approximately 8.73 acres, stated as 40% of net site area, with 800 proposed trees. This provides a substantial planning benchmark, but it does not confirm a finished garden, specific amenity, planting species, completion date or view from a home. The current landscape plan should be checked for usable distribution, ground conditions, shade, pedestrian continuity and phase responsibility.
Large percentages need spatial interpretation. Ask how much of the stated landscape is accessible shared space, how much is a setback or buffer, and how much lies above a basement structure. Check whether walking routes connect residential towers without crossing primary vehicle movement and whether commercial circulation changes access to shared spaces.
The utility programme includes a 2,020 KLD sewage treatment plant, a 1,020-cubic-metre rainwater sump and 22 recharge pits. Those figures support questions about recycled-water use, monsoon storage, groundwater recharge, maintenance access and phasing. They do not establish plant performance or delivery.
Request the current itemised amenity and landscape schedules before comparing projects. The schedule should identify location, serving phase, dimensions, capacity, access, maintenance responsibility and delivery status. Do not treat a representative image, generic portal list or visual theme as proof that a facility is included.
For long-term use, compare the operating plan as carefully as the feature list. Ask who manages water systems, landscape and shared areas, how costs are allocated between residential and commercial components, and what capacity is available when later phases are occupied. These questions connect the proposal’s environmental systems to everyday ownership.
Landscape allocation
Approximately 8.73 acres is proposed as landscape, stated as 40% of net site area; distribution and delivery require the current plan.
Tree programme
800 trees are proposed; species, maturity, planting location and delivery phase require the current landscape schedule.
Sewage treatment
A 2,020 KLD plant is proposed; request current phasing, location, reuse and operating details.
Rainwater and recharge
A 1,020-cubic-metre sump and 22 recharge pits are proposed; confirm location, capacity allocation and maintenance.
Current price information
No current project-specific home price, base rate, cost sheet, payment plan, inventory or availability is established. A reliable comparison begins only when the legal project name, phase, configuration, area basis and issue date are present on the same commercial package.
Request a dated unit-specific cost sheet and separate its components. Compare base consideration, parking, floor or location preferences, taxes, deposits, advance maintenance and other charges. Check the validity period, cancellation terms, payment milestones and payment recipient.
Match the cost sheet to the current floor plan and area statement before comparing a rate per square foot. Generalized 3 BHK and 4 BHK area ranges on this site are planning guides and must not be used to calculate a project price.
Verify the payment beneficiary through an independently obtained current channel and ensure that the agreement, registration record and payment instructions identify the same legal project and phase. A marketing message without that matching document set is not enough for a commercial decision.
Home configuration
3 BHK
- Current price
- On request
Current project price, inventory and availability are not established; the configuration label is generalized guidance, not a confirmed current-project unit type.
Request current price documentsHome configuration
4 BHK
- Current price
- On request
Current project price, inventory and availability are not established; the configuration label is generalized guidance, not a confirmed current-project unit type.
Request current price documentsRepresentative residential context
The gallery presents six original artist impressions covering an arrival court, tree-canopy walk, living and dining room, bedroom, planted balcony and courtyard threshold. They help households discuss the atmosphere, material qualities and landscape relationships they value.
None of the images depicts a confirmed project building, entrance, interior finish, amenity, planting scheme or view. They cannot add a feature to the planning schedule or replace a current specification. Compare any future project image by caption, phase, unit type and contractual status.
Use the exterior scenes to ask about shade, pedestrian comfort, vehicle separation and landscape maintenance. Use the interior scenes to ask about measured room sizes, finishes, glazing, balcony depth, ventilation and outlook. Those answers must come from current project documents and the selected home plan.
Representative imagery is most useful when it sharpens questions rather than settling them. Save the current specification, finish schedule and measured plan beside any image used in a shortlist, and record which details are contractual.
Arrival court context
Tree-canopy walk context
Living and dining context
Bedroom context
Planted balcony context
Courtyard threshold context
Artist’s impression
Dommasandra location context
The project planning point is in Dommasandra, off Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru. It gives buyers a locality for an initial comparison, but it is not a confirmed entrance, legal boundary, sales office or route origin. No destination distances or travel times are published on this site because the current entrance has not been established.
Use the map for broad orientation only. Once the legal location schedule and entrance are available, test recurring journeys from that exact gate. Include work, school, healthcare, shopping and transit routes that matter to the household, and check them at the times they will normally be used.
The last stretch deserves its own visit. Inspect road width, turning movement, pedestrian conditions, drainage, street lighting and the relationship between residential and commercial access. A locality label cannot answer those questions, and a route from a central pin can overstate or understate the real journey.
Separate current access from proposed infrastructure. A future road or transit idea should not be built into a purchase assumption until an accountable authority confirms its scope and delivery. Record live route alternatives and revisit them when the confirmed gate, phase and occupancy schedule become clear.
Keep the planning point qualification beside every map use. It prevents an approximate coordinate from becoming an invented project gate while still allowing an early Dommasandra and Sarjapur Road orientation.
Map centred on an approximate planning point, not a confirmed project entrance, legal boundary or sales office.
Butterfly of Dreams buyer questions
IdentityIs Butterfly of Dreams the confirmed public project name?
No confirmed public project name is established. Butterfly of Dreams is the publisher’s working name, so buyers should match the legal project name, company, phase and date across current documents.
ScaleWhat is the proposed project scale?
The proposal describes approximately 22.25 acres gross site area, 1,188 proposed residential units, six residential towers and one commercial block. These planning figures do not establish construction, inventory or availability.
LocationWhere is the project planned?
The available planning point is in Dommasandra, off Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru. The coordinate is not a confirmed entrance, legal boundary, sales office or route origin.
PlansAre the master-plan and floor-plan images current project drawings?
No. The master-planning image and 3 BHK and 4 BHK images are generic conceptual guides, not current-project plans or measurements, and they are not to scale.
ConfigurationsAre 3 BHK and 4 BHK homes confirmed?
The generalized 3 BHK range of 2,400-3,500 sq ft and 4 BHK range of 4,500-6,000 sq ft are publisher-approved planning references. They do not confirm current-project configurations, area bases, inventory or availability.
LandscapeWhat landscape provision is proposed?
The planning programme states approximately 8.73 acres of landscape, described as 40% of net site area, and 800 proposed trees. It is not a delivered landscape or guaranteed view.
UtilitiesWhich utility systems are proposed?
The proposal includes a 2,020 KLD sewage treatment plant, a 1,020-cubic-metre rainwater sump and 22 recharge pits. Completion and operating performance are not established.
PriceIs a current home price available?
No current project-specific home price, rate, cost sheet, payment plan, inventory or availability is established. Request a dated commercial package carrying the same legal project and phase as the current plans.
CompanyWhich party is identified as the project company?
IINSPIRA GOLD COUNTY LLP is identified as the project company. This neutral label does not establish a developer, promoter, builder, seller or authorised-channel role.
DocumentsWhat should a buyer compare next?
Compare the legal project identity, registration record, current master plan, configuration and area schedule, specification, dated cost sheet, payment terms and payment-recipient details as one matching document set.